[s4s] Tribune

grope a panda >>12906726

portmanteau propaganda?

maybe?

*sip*

Your fortune: Reply hazy, try again >>12906772
you have to talk to them like they're toddlers

you did good tea Atheists really think the world's most popular and studied book that existed for 2,000+ years has some kind of horrible secret nobody but them has found out.

Hubris. >>12906788
everyone already knows this they just think it's good because they are paedophiles >>12906724
based >>12906724
wait Trump is Jewish?? >>12906788
you mean the insanely retranslated, rephrased, omitted from, added to after the fact, desert cult handbook that stole concepts from other sources of which no real original examples exist?

Yeah pretty big hubris coming out of those agnostics and other 3k religious beliefs. >>12906828
Yes. >>12906868
hey the message still makes it through, be a child and make fun of the bald you get the bears. >>>/lgbt/ and / pol/ at the same time >>12906868
We must never trust any historical accounts or translatons because they could be lying or something.

Woaw. >>12906724
the naked runaway is one of the few incidents in the synoptic gospel narrative that's unique to the gospel of mark. mark is also the shortest of the synoptic gospels and has the least unique material. could it be that the rest of the molestation story was a mark exclusive and got cut out by the catholic church? that kid was me >>12906919
Yes, unironically, you almost get it.

Your fortune: Very Bad Luck >>12906931
George washington didn't exist. Neither did plato, socrates, cleopatra, julius ceasar, etc.

History is a lie and I only believe in things I have 100% certainty of. plato my ass more like plate o bullshit >>12906938
oh yea then who invented ceasar salad R*TARD? >>12906938
Unlike those well accounted and probably also exaggerated figures in certain cases, Jesus didn't really exist outside of hearsay accounts (especially as portrayed in the desert handbook), he was the actually just the first popular super hero and his worshipers are the first blood cult soys.

But deep down you know that right? Some little rational part of your brain is screaming at you that you've been lied to and conned? >>12906953
A vast majority of history is based on secondhand accounts. Historians don't consider this unreliable. Do you believe in the holocaust? >>12906975
I believe it is easily the most overblown bullshit in recent history especially in comparison to the history happening at the time the fact you even ask about it suggests without a doubt you're actually hopeless. >>12906977
I was testing your hypocracy. You still don't understand how historical evidence works. Not even courts operate off of your view. If 100 bystanders claim to have witnessesed a crime and there is evidence of the crime, it is perfectly reasonable and logical to believe a crime took place. Even if you didn't see it yourself.